This debate is a must watch. Ann Coulter equates Tea Party racism charges to evidence of CNN’s Rick Sanchez looking at kiddie porn… Neither of which exists.
H/T Newsbusters
The below piece was featured in today’s Washington Examiner. By Don Todd - Should a union officer be able to [Read More]
You know the campaign season is heated up when politicians resort to the age-old dishonest tactic of misquoting their [Read More]
By Rebekah Rast - “Our federal tax system is, in short, utterly impossible, utterly unjust and completely [Read More]
Americans for Limited Government filed an official of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the U.S. [Read More]
If people would shut up and listen to what Breitbart said himself, the issue wasn’t what Sherrod said at all. It was to show the “crowd” of NAACP members speaking and murmuring in agreement as she talked about her “getting back” at the poor white farmer. And they knew nothing about the continuation of her story, nor that she was using that as a prelude to saying how “wrong” it was to feel like that. It’s about the NAACP agreeing with racist comments on the face of it, as they were spoken, in context with that organization only recently branding the tea party as “racist”, etc. Instead, the mainstream media, as usual, only looks at the surface, doesn’t listen to the man himself and his reasons for posting the excerpt in the first place. They simply try to “gotcha” on the fact that the excerpt wasn’t showing how she overcame racism. They, like the White House and everyone else jumped her because they knee-jerk all the time, when they could have simply listened to the real point about the NAACP, and Sherrod would have had no problems.
Way to go Ann you rock. I think he spent the whole interview wondering what hit him. Hee hee!
Good to know Rick Sanchez is a proud member of the bottom 50% of the intelligence pool.
If you receive a recording of a continuous statement which lasts thirty minutes and which appears to have been unaltered, why must you assume the recording is “out of context?” How much of “the record” must you obtain for “due diligence?” Is it sufficient to demand a recording of the previous and following five minutes of the statement? Or fifty minutes? Or fifty hours? Or fifty days, weeks, or years? Other than reviewing the entire previous life of the speaker, how can you possibly defend yourself against the accusation of taking the statement “out of context?”
Ann DESTROYS him
Rick, Rick, Rick… You just got decimated. You were completedly destroyed in this debate and your only response was to try hypobole and drama (such as putting on your reading glasses). Weak and lame… I’d quit if I were you. I’d be too demoralized and embarrassed to continue. But you’re strong. You keep at it kitty! I mean tiger…
Rick Sanchez makes a false argument when he state that you cannot prove a negative argument. This is false.
RS is illogical. Ann is right, logical, and yet she’s a mere woman.
Come to think of it Ann is correct factually all the time, as our years of research show… More later
MHP President, Capierce Writing
So does Rick Sanchez wanna talk about the TRUTH about his DUI hit and run that made a man permanently quadriplegic? He’s a disgrace, and he could only get a job on a station that has slid so far down as CNN! No news there…
Ann, you deliver a mean left hook. Ricardo’s eyes were “X’d out” halfway through that video.
Hee Haw ! what a Jack Ass ! Sherod IS a Bigot was a Bigot and will always be a bigot. Spit.
Once a racist always a racist, it’s like I was a racist before i wasn’t a racist, it’s like a typical political save your butt double speak. Ann is a killer when it comes to liberals