Comments on: Ann Coulter Debates Rick Sanchez over Shirley Sherrod

By: Da Kingfish

Da Kingfish — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 03:04:53 +0000

Once a racist always a racist, it’s like I was a racist before i wasn’t a racist, it’s like a typical political save your butt double speak. Ann is a killer when it comes to liberals

By: hh

hh — Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:57:51 +0000

Hee Haw ! what a Jack Ass ! Sherod IS a Bigot was a Bigot and will always be a bigot. Spit.

By: Joe Wright

Joe Wright — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:50:55 +0000

Ann, you deliver a mean left hook. Ricardo’s eyes were “X’d out” halfway through that video.

By: boe

boe — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:35:30 +0000

So does Rick Sanchez wanna talk about the TRUTH about his DUI hit and run that made a man permanently quadriplegic? He’s a disgrace, and he could only get a job on a station that has slid so far down as CNN! No news there…

By: mhowardpierce

mhowardpierce — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:31:55 +0000

RS is illogical. Ann is right, logical, and yet she’s a mere woman.

Come to think of it Ann is correct factually all the time, as our years of research show… More later
MHP President, Capierce Writing

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:26:40 +0000

Rick Sanchez makes a false argument when he state that you cannot prove a negative argument. This is false.

By: Haj

Haj — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:51:07 +0000

Rick, Rick, Rick… You just got decimated. You were completedly destroyed in this debate and your only response was to try hypobole and drama (such as putting on your reading glasses). Weak and lame… I’d quit if I were you. I’d be too demoralized and embarrassed to continue. But you’re strong. You keep at it kitty! I mean tiger…

By: Jay

Jay — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:56:08 +0000

Ann DESTROYS him

By: MOSwas71331

MOSwas71331 — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:27:43 +0000

If you receive a recording of a continuous statement which lasts thirty minutes and which appears to have been unaltered, why must you assume the recording is “out of context?” How much of “the record” must you obtain for “due diligence?” Is it sufficient to demand a recording of the previous and following five minutes of the statement? Or fifty minutes? Or fifty hours? Or fifty days, weeks, or years? Other than reviewing the entire previous life of the speaker, how can you possibly defend yourself against the accusation of taking the statement “out of context?”

By: BillyJack

BillyJack — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:05:21 +0000

Good to know Rick Sanchez is a proud member of the bottom 50% of the intelligence pool.