The Government’s Weight-Loss Program

By Rebekah Rast -

As America’s debt and unemployment rate continue to climb, so does its weight.

America is quickly becoming the fattest nation in the world. Results from the 2007–2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) indicate that about 34.2 percent of U.S. adults aged 20 years and over are overweight, 33.8 percent are obese and 5.7 percent are extremely obese.

But, as big of a problem as it may be, is it the right of the federal government to step in and begin regulating the diets of Americans?

Michelle Obama thinks that it is, and is busy launching an initiative that starts with America’s overweight children.

Partnering even with Walt Disney, Mrs. Obama has pushed her initiative, “Let’s Move,” with Public Service Announcements, appearing with various Disney stars and even helped some of them plant a garden.

Though Mrs. Obama has recently touted the weight problem amongst school-aged children as her No. 1 priority while she’s in the White House, this isn’t the first time the issue has been discussed.

Eating a proper diet even became a topic at now Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearings.

When Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma asked her during the hearings if the government can pass a law forcing Americans to eat fruits and vegetables, her answer wasn’t no.

So what does this mean? Does the government have more up its sleeve than just Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move” initiative?

Some state governments have already taken steps to make its citizens more aware of the fatty, high-calorie foods in restaurants.

In 2008, in California, for example, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation that made it the first state in the nation to have its restaurant chains with 20 or more locations statewide post calorie information on menus and indoor menu boards for consumers. New York passed similar legislation for restaurant chains, but went a step further and ruled that some cities have to have nutritional information posted directly on the menus. New York has also banned the use of all artificial trans fat in restaurant foods.

The federal government followed suit and passed a federal-menu labeling law within ObamaCare. This new law will affect restaurants with 20 or more locations by forcing them to put nutritional information for menu items on the menus themselves, menu boards and even drive-thrus. This law also requires vending machine owners to comply by the same rules.

In April 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a plan to begin limiting the amount of salt allowed in processed foods. Though it does not know what the reduced sodium levels will be, the FDA hopes to implement the plan over a 10-year span.

There is no denying that today’s American diet has a penchant towards salt, but is it the role of the federal government to limit the intake?

“Not only does the federal government not have the Constitutional authority to regulate its citizens’ diets, how could it?” asks Bill Wilson, president of Americans for Limited Government (ALG). “The big-government policies of this Administration have failed. What would make the American people think that the government’s handling of their diets would be any different?”

Yet, the White House is still trying. Following the pleas of Mrs. Obama, the Senate passed the Child Nutrition bill — a good start for her “Let’s Move” initiative. This bill would provide $4.5 billion to school lunch and other federal child-nutrition programs.

An Associated Press article on the subject stated that schools wouldn’t do away with popular foods, like hamburgers, but would make them healthier — higher-quality meat and a whole wheat bun perhaps. Also, vending machines would be stocked with less candy and sugar-filled drinks.

The House has yet to pass the bill. Mrs. Obama hopes it might come up for a discussion during a lame-duck session in November.

It seems this Congress and Administration has forgotten that eating at McDonald’s is a choice. Whether the calories are posted on the menus or not, if someone is craving a double cheeseburger, they are probably going to get one. You don’t go to a fast food restaurant expecting a healthy meal.

The more the government intrudes on the lives of Americans, the less freedom its people have.
Yes, America has a weight problem, but it’s not the federal government’s job to fix it.

Rebekah Rast is a contributing editor to Americans for Limited Government (ALG) News Bureau.

Related Articles
  • Pingback: Must Reads for October 8 | NetRight Daily

  • Pingback: “The Government’s Weight-Loss Program”

  • http://www.itsaboutmakingbabies.com Brad K.

    As I understand it, high fructose corn syrup has been shown to influence – accelerate – the formation of body fat over and about the calories, when compared to the same amount of calories in table sugar. And soft drinks went to HFCS shortly before we noticed the growing obesity problem.

    Similarly, it has been shown that computers and computer games cause more feelings of hunger than similar time spent in non-electronic activity.

    I do note that parents that use TV to “entertain” children instead of sharing household, garden, and work tasks with their children, are missing an opportunity to inculcate patience, attention span, cultural and familial values, bond with and get to know their children, etc. And TV time has not been shown to benefit the body as much as regular walking, lifting, carrying – and the physical closeness and character development – of working with their parents.

    Labeling food is an escapist, illusory act. Foods in the grocery store are labeled, and the obesity issue didn’t dissolve overnight.

    Another complication is the assumption of affluence. Affluence can be measured in the distance from a person’s life to rote manual labor. Even walking a block or three for shopping is considered arduous, to the wealthy. And today no one wants to look less than affluent. With Peak Oil that will be changing. Gardening, walking and bike righting will no longer be the whims of the wealthy, but become the staples of the masses. For now the best use of resources is to work toward preparation and transition, not waste money penalizing the companies and people actually employing citizens with inane vote-buying schemes.

  • http://www.uwsp.edu/athletics/mbb/06-07/schedule.htm Schedule

    Maybe you could make changes to the page subject The Government’s Weight-Loss Program | NetRight Daily to something more specific for your subject you make. I enjoyed the post nevertheless.

  • Pingback: Government: The Great Dietitian | dramaga news

  • Pingback: NYC Government: The Great Dietitian | Mobile Food News

Back to top

Copyright © 2008-2012 NetRight Daily