02.29.2012 in Politics by Rick Manning 13

The Electric Vehicle Brick

By Rick Manning — The bad news just keeps coming for the Obama Administration’s push to force electric vehicles on the public with the revelation that the much loved Tesla line up of vehicles have a singular problem — they become bricks if the battery runs out.

That’s right, the $100,000+ Tesla vehicle reportedly has at least five instances out of the mere 2,200 in production where the vehicle ceased to function when the battery ran down to a zero charge.  The Tesla didn’t just need a recharge like a cell phone, no, the $32,000 battery needs to be replaced entirely when it runs out – at the owners expense.

Of course the $32,000 replacement charge does not include transporting the now inert “vehicle” whose wheels no longer move, or the labor to replace the battery.   The total estimated cost to the Tesla customer is $40,000, because in spite of the bumper to bumper warranty, the battery running out of juice is considered the customers fault.

Ordinarily, a car built for the eclectic wealthy class would not matter, but the Tesla is different.

The Tesla Corporation was singled out by Obama’s Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Agency as a company of the future, during a regulatory “study” conducted to determine the volume of vehicles manufacturers would produce in 2025.

The study was part of the EPA and Transportation’s dramatic change to the nation’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard (CAFÉ) which dictate the average fleet gas mileage requirements that each automobile manufacturing company must meet.

The new standards are set to rise to 54.5 miles per gallon in the next thirteen years and the Tesla was at least a part of the Obama social engineers plan to force industry to conform to the new law.

Tesla is important because in many respects, it just might be the last solely electric car company standing with the announcement that the much hoped for Fisker Automotive has run into severe financial problems with layoffs announced at two of their facilities.  This, in spite of already receiving $193 million of taxpayer funded loan out of a promised $529 million.

Fisker, which is developing another $100,000 car for the masses using taxpayer dollars, is under Department of Energy scrutiny because they have missed development and sales milestones.  Ironically, the Fisker vehicle is called the Karma.

The fallout of the pending Fisker failure is that taxpayer dollar funded electric fuel cell developer A123 is now also in danger of failing due to its reliance on their Fisker contract.  For those without enough taxpayer heartburn, A123 has received a cool $249 million from the Obama Administration’s crack Energy Department venture socialism division.

But back to the brickworks at Tesla Corporation, the recipient of $465 million in taxpayer dollars from the Obama Administration, is attempting to change the game by introducing a new vehicle model which can be purchased for under $65,000.

Of course, the car still costs $40,000 to repair if you let the charge run down, so buyer beware.

By the way, how many Tesla’s did the Obama Administration guess would be produced and purchased by the ever environmentally concerned American public in 2025?

31,974. That is a lot of very expensive bricks.

Rick Manning is the Director of Communications of Americans for Limited Government.

  • Pingback: NetRight Daily » The Electric Vehicle Brick | Electric Vehicles

  • Dean

    Gosh, When my batteries run completely down in my flashlight it no longer gives me light.  Batteries do that.

  • AtlasObjectivist

    Yeah but, the flashlight would not be broke and considered by the manufacturer to be misused by the end user.  Not to mention there wouldn’t be a repair bill. 

  • http://twitter.com/whodistalking whodistalking

    I have seen the car. Beautiful! Comes with big thick 220 power cord,LOL! Forget to charge and it costs you $40,000,who needs the pressure! After a few years the batteries don’t hold a charge as well anymore. You have an old car that needs a massive infusion of money. You can’t sell it for any good money ,it’s needs a massive new battery and installation. The potential buyer holds that over you in any negotiation. Good Luck.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_D2X75H3HIWGXJ3V47NIDVYDDZU L Ford

    This trait of the Tesla’s battery system is one shared by virtually all rechargeable batteries, including the old standard “wet” lead-acid batteries.  If the batteries are discharged below a certain minimum voltage, the batteries are damaged to the extent they can no longer hold a charge and have to be replaced.

  • Bsomcebod

    Tesla, the man, can safely roll in his grave with laughter at the Blamer-In-Chief and the manufacturer of the Tesla auto.

  • FlaJim

    What kind of idiot buys a $100,000 car that can travel only 30 miles before it has to be recharged for 12 to 18 hours?  Some people have a lot more money (probably inherited) than brains.

  • julian8

    The domacrats have one big problem, try as they might they just can’t seem to overturn the laws of physics.  But I am sure they will keep at it.

  • Highsider

    Idiots like the spoiler Ralph Nader and president Taqiyya Hussien Obuslim should leave the automotive engineering to the automotive engineers.   They have already cost the American taxpayers and consumers way too much.

  • jpjsm

    cant the pres issue battery stamps for those poor folks?

  • Highsider

    Not necessarily so. Often when a completely depleted lead acid battery (salted plates) is put on a trickle charger for a couple of weeks, they can be revived.

  • Pingback: GetLiberty.org >> Home

  • CybersaurusREXX

    No one needs a $100,000, 130MPH EV “BRICK”,  Some of us can afford a $20,000If no one can meet these specs without an Obama subsidy, FUGGABOTIT!

Back to top

Copyright © 2008-2014 NetRight Daily