04.05.2012 in Politics by Rebecca DiFede 8

Possible affirmative action bluff ‘Warrents’ a second look

By Rebecca DiFede — Since the Civil Rights era, colleges and universities have had affirmative action programs in place to ensure that all students, regardless of race or ethnicity, have equal admission opportunities. However, this system was not put in place as a “get into college free card” for those white kids who didn’t quite make the grade and wanted an extra boost.

Recently, it came out in the Boston Herald that Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren may have lied about her Native American heritage to not only get into Harvard Law School, but also advance her career as a law professor.

When asked about the origin of her heritage, Warren hastily pointed to an old marriage application online of her great-great-great grandmother where her ethnicity is listed as Cherokee. However a physical copy of the application has yet to be found and although the marriage license has been located, it does not list the woman’s ethnicity.

Genealogists at the New England Historical Society have been attempting to determine the authenticity of Warren’s suggested ethnicity but as of yet have found no conclusive proof that she is any more Native American than she is Vulcan.

Of course candidate Warren vehemently maintains her Cherokee designation. She scolded her opponent, Republican Scott Brown, for suggesting that she needed help becoming a teacher.

She implied that he was also suggesting that her gender was a factor, poising the sarcastic question “what does he think it takes for a woman to be qualified?”

Here, Warren is attempting to turn her own scandal into some sort of “war on women” smoke screen. Perhaps she was unaware of the egregious irony of her statement.

Senate candidate Warren listed herself as a minority for nine years in a law school directory hoping, as she put it, “that I would be invited to a luncheon, a group something that might happen with people who are like I am.”

Like what, Liars Anonymous?

The entire program of affirmative action promotes this type of behavior because it gives the example that because of laws made decades ago that have long since been overturned, minorities need an extra boost getting into college and receiving financial aid and job opportunities, and if you list yourself as such you will receive special treatment.

Although at the time in which it was instated, affirmative action was necessary to prevent blatant racial discrimination against minority students applying to universities because of the social climate of the country at that time. However, the times have changed and that type of profiling is not only frowned up, it is illegal. And yet the extra credit feature for those claiming minority status is still in place.

Those kids who have no minority heritage to cling to can simply check a box on their application other than “White/Caucasian” and be placed in a special category with different standards than their “non-minority” counterparts.

From this angle, it would seem that the system is flawed against those who identify most with the “White/Caucasian” check box. This is as unfair as skewing the process away from minorities was in the 1950’s and earlier.

“Equal protection under the law” means just that. All people, regardless of the color of their skin, or the skin of their ancestors, will receive equal treatment by the government. Having one side benefit more than the other defeats the purpose of “equal.”

And here, Elizabeth Warren may not have been truthful about her ethnicity and falsified it just to gain acceptance to a prestigious law school and later get a job teaching there. If true, her actions are despicable and disrespectful to all those who put in the extra work and drive to accomplish their goals.

Life is not a video game; someone shouldn’t be able to simply get cheat codes and bypass the obstacles. Each person must earn their own way on merit, not lie or depend on government freebies to get a pass to not work as hard.

Rebecca DiFede is a contributing editor to Americans of Limited Government.

Related Articles
  • ILPatriot

    Hey, give her a break.  She was looking to meet people just like her – you know, 1/32 Native American.  There must be thousands of them at Harvard Law.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Bradley/100003202716960 Peter Bradley

    Even at my daughter’s young age, this kind of thing is a concern. I’ve often though about “checking a box” to give her a boost, but in the end I just don’t roll that way. And luckily, she hasn’t needed it. But it is disturbing to see her honors classes dragged down by kids who have no business being there who got in just by gaming the system. Oh, I know, because their parents proudly admit to it, and think we are stupid for not doing the same thing! Maybe we are.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_J5E2IJNF4FF2V4FTWQDDYMAEGE Lee W

    When my daughter attended school in Phoenix, her roomate was a full-blood Navajo.  One evening the girls started talking about their respective ancestors. 
    My daughter’s great-great grandmother on her father’s side was Choctaw, and the roomate asked why my daughter had not applied under the supposed ruling of Native American preference.  She claimed my daughter was 1/32nd Choctaw, but upon working out the ins and outs of the lineage, they decided my daughter was 1/64th Choctaw, NOT 1/32nd!
    The same applies to Elizabeth Warren!  When one works out the math, 1/64th is just too little to get excited about, and never should be used as a crutch to get into school or any other preferred treatment!
    Personally, I hope the whole thing blows up in Warren’s face!

  • Bcfrombu

    I thought she attended Rutgers Law School?

  • Chuck 1

    This person is supposed to be an ethical Harvard Law School graduate.  She may be a graduate but she is not ethical.  If she was ethical she would not have made the claims in the first place.  If she received money based upon the claims of a minority status she need to be put in the dock and charged with the crime of extorting money under false pretexts.  She is no better than Madoff.  

  • JeromefromLayton

    OK, maybe there is another side to this story. Since the Seventies, we have all been peppered with the ethnic identity questioning form, the one that lists several different kinds of Asians, Africans, Middle Eastern, and so on but with just one kind of “white”. Sometimes, the form is mandatory (Air Force, in 1973) and it has to be filled out. Two of my female ancestors were omitted from the 1830 Indiana Census while there was a father and “legitimate” children in the house. That would be “Indians, not taxed”. So, on one form I checked “Other” because of the two Indian ancestors. The campus Native American group tried to recruit me and my 1/64 Native American heritage for the next two years! 

  • williamlsasman

    Better check this lady out before election. If she has been living with this lie she needs to be checked for how long and get her in her place.

  • My2Cents

    I lean to the right, but I like facts.  I don’t know the people or the politics involved but it reads like a hit piece based on little more than speculation.  The issue itself is not something I imagine most Americans would care about if it were true, and the author doesn’t appear to have any evidence to support her speculation.  If anything, the author merely brings to light how the whole system of affirmative action is unfair to all applicants who are chosen on their merit alone.  Warren very well may be Cherokee, there’s nothing here that suggests otherwise.  What kind of person would make a claim for which they have no evidence?  A person being paid to do so, that’s who.

Back to top

Copyright © 2008-2013 NetRight Daily