Leaked email shows Obama administration’s plan to make sequester more painful

UPDATE: A park ranger has revealed that supervisors are attempting to make cuts only to parts where the public will see in a way to make them feel the pain. As FoxNews reported:

A U.S. park ranger, who did not wish to be identified, told FoxNews.com that supervisors within the National Park Service (NPS) overruled plans to deal with the budget cuts that would have had minimal impact on the public. Instead, the source said, park staff were told to cancel special events and cut “interpretation services” — the talks, tours and other education services provided by local park rangers.

As Rahm Emanuel famously said, “Never let a crisis go to waste.” Even though he is no longer in the White House, Obama has not failed to keep applying that lesson. A leaked email shows that the Obama administration is trying to make the cuts to government spending implemented by the sequester as painful as possible.

In fact, in places where cuts aren’t necessarily going to happen due to the sequester, the Obama administration is instructing the government to cut anyways because they said it would have to happen.

Congressman Tim Griffin (R-AZ) blasted the move from the Obama administration saying, “This email confirms what many Americans have suspected: The Obama Administration is doing everything they can to make sure their worst predictions come true and to maximize the pain of the Sequester cuts for political gain.  Instead of cutting waste, the Administration Obama is hurting workers. President Obama should stop protecting wasteful government spending.”

As Griffin noted in a press release:

According to an internal email, Charles Brown, the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS) eastern regional director, asked his superiors about how much flexibility he had in trimming his program’s budget in light of the sequester.  The response from the Obama Administration was clear:

“We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 States in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’  So, it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.” (emphasis added)

That response, according to Brown’s email, came from someone in the USDA’s Office of Budget and Program Analysis (OBPA), which is responsible for “coordinating the preparation of the Department’s budget estimates, legislative reports and regulations.  OBPA provides direction and administration of the Department’s budgetary functions including development, presentation, and administration of the budget,” according to the agency’s website.

In Obama’s White House, you make it up as you go along. The fact of the matter is, the sequester cuts are not “devastating” and Obama himself said that the cuts are not the “apocalypse”.

The Obama administration needs to spare us of this BS and cut out the theatrics and feaux hysterics.

  • http://soquelbythecreek.blogspot.com/ Soquel by the Creek

    There is no doubt. The Obama Administration would rather make our lives a living hell than cut 2-3% in future spending growth.

  • Pingback: Leaked Email: Obama Will Ensure Sequestration Hurts | American Clarion

  • vevaqus

    It was immediately obvious. Obama didn’t get his way thru campaigning, so is now GETTING EVEN. Just like a spoiled brat!
    I

  • LittleMoose

    The “sequester” didn’t mean a thing. Because the government runs on “baseline budgeting”, the government will still spend more in 2013-2014 then they did in 2012-2013.

Back to top

Copyright © 2008-2014 NetRight Daily