05.03.2013 4

Behind the Unemployment Headlines

By Rick Manning

The headlines read that the nation’s unemployment rate for April hit 7.5 percent.  But the real story behind the headline is that America is becoming a society of labor drop outs.  These charts using just released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics have been compiled to help you look behind the headlines at our nation’s unemployment problem.

Since Obama took office, the number of Americans considered to be eligible to participate in the workforce has increased by 10.4 million people.

But, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the workforce only increased by 1 million workers since President Obama took office.

The number of Americans reporting to the Bureau of Labor Statistics that they are not in the labor force has jumped by 9.5 million since Obama took office.

And as one would expect given the collapse of the number of people in the workforce, the labor participation rate has fallen dramatically as it reflects the difference between the non-institutionalized civilian population (working population) and the civilian labor force.

While the total number of Americans employed has risen by approximately 1.3 million, this is a stunningly low number when the total number of people who could have gotten a job exceeds 10.4 million.

A fact that is likely to go under reported is that if the Labor Participation Rate had remained steady throughout the Obama years, a full 161 million Americans would be in the workforce and the unemployment rate would be at 10.8 percent.

Happy talk coming from official Washington, D.C. aside, our nation’s economy remains mired in an unemployment crisis.  What is different in 2013 than in past times of high unemployment is that a combination of government services and programs significantly impacts the urgency of prospective workers actively seeking employment.

This dangerous side effect of government compassion may just be at the heart of the continuing decline of the percentage of Americans who are participating in the above ground economy.  As what was initially intended as a government safety net ensnares those who are in it, the incentive to take a job that is “beneath you” in order to get by is stripped away.

For young people this is particularly pernicious.  As a group that should be breaking away from dependence upon their parents in some cases merely transfers that dependence to the government, setting the stage for a lifetime of failing to strive and achieve their own personal American dream.

While the stage is set for this disastrous consequence, it will take a couple of years to learn how many of these young workers have been lost to the entitlement mentality that the expanded social safety net is breeding.

Rick Manning (@rmanning957) is the vice president of public policy and communications for Americans for Limited Government.

  • Mike Fesler

    Please don’t confuse them with the facts. . . . they are
    still trying to find out what they voted for in the Obamacare package.

  • JJM123

    Numbers don’t lie – it’s the people that misrepresent them that do.
    So the workforce has only accommodated 10% of the people who should be new workers. ‘Don’t worry about Great Depression II, we’ve got it all under control’ (until handout money dries up).

  • jwatersphd

    So you’ve managed to discover that the unemployed don’t really want to work? Well, let’s try to exacerbate their poverty and bankruptcy, that’ll show them. Or is it that there are so few jobs that people gave up trying? If so, I suppose your solution is the usual right wing recipe – lay off government workers and stop spending on government services, and then we’ll have (?) more jobs? Why is that? Throwing people off jobs and reducing essential services (e.g., air traffic controllers) does not help the situation, Rick. Is that really difficult to see? The only fault with Obama is that he has caught “deficit fever” too and tries to mollify the “government is the problem” crowd . . . just as FDR did when we were emerging from the Depression in the 30s, so that the recovery stalled and it took WWII to really recover. What was WWII? Massive government spending! There’s a time for deficit reduction, but it’s not now, it’s when the recovery has happened.

Back to top

Copyright © 2008-2016 Americans for Limited Government